A federal district court in Florida has held that the individual insurance coverage mandate under the federal health care reform law is unconstitutional. Further, the court concluded that the insurance mandate could not be severed from the broader health reform law and that it therefore rendered the entire law unconstitutional. Texas was among 26 states that brought the action challenging the constitutionality of the individual coverage mandate, which is not scheduled to take effect until 2014. This is the second district court to hold the individual coverage mandate unconstitutional, while two other district courts held it constitutional. Florida vs. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Case No.: 3:10-cv-91-RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. January 31, 2011).
On January 25, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted final rules implementing the approval of executive compensation (and frequency of approval of executive compensation) and golden parachute compensation as required under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Under the final rules, public companies subject to the federal proxy rules are required to: (1) provide their shareholders with an advisory vote on executive compensation at least once every three calendar years (?Ç£say-on-pay?Ç¥), (2) provide their shareholders with an advisory vote on the desired frequency of these votes at least once every six calendar years (say-on-frequency); (3) provide shareholders with an advisory vote on golden parachute arrangements and understandings in connection with merger and other corporate transactions (say-on-golden-parachute compensation); and (4) provide additional disclosure of golden parachute arrangements in merger proxy statements. The say-on-pay and say-on-frequency votes are required at least once every three years and every… Continue Reading