[benefits] blog logo

What Does the Fox Case Say? No Standing to Assert Fiduciary Breach without Showing of Personal Harm

The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia reminds plaintiffs that they may have standing under ERISA for their suit, but they also must have standing to sue under Article III of the U.S. constitution.  Article III requires plaintiffs to allege a personal stake in the outcome in order to have standing to sue.  The court followed previous cases which have held that multiemployer plan participants do not have Article III standing to sue plan trustees for breach of fiduciary duty unless the financial viability of the plan is at stake.  The trustees had failed to collect contributions from the long-delinquent employer, but there was no allegation that those failures adversely affect the plaintiff’s benefits under the plan. Although the employees sued on behalf of the Plan, because they could not show that the trustees’ failure directly harmed their benefits, there was no injury, and the suit was dismissed for lack of standing. Fox v. McCormick, No. 12-1869 (RMC) (D.D.C. Dec. 9, 2013).

The lawyers of our Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Practice Group are readily able to assist companies on a nationwide basis with implementing sophisticated benefit plans and providing answers to their most challenging compensation issues. Additionally, our lawyers are well aware of the daily employee benefits challenges facing companies of all sizes and are capable of helping in-house lawyers and human resources personnel with the day-to-day advice and guidance necessary to properly administer employee benefits plans.

Related Topics: , ,

Leave a Reply

January 2014
« Dec   Feb »