[benefits] blog logo

Court Holds that Benefit Denial Notices Must Include Time Limits for Judicial Review

In the case of Moyer v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that a notice of benefit denial under ERISA must include not only a statement of the claimant?ÇÖs right to judicial review of the benefit denial, but also any associated time limits for filing a claim for judicial review. Moyer was a participant in an employer-sponsored long-term disability plan that was subject to ERISA (the ?Ç£Plan?Ç¥). MetLife was the designated claims fiduciary under the Plan. MetLife denied Moyer?ÇÖs claim for benefits and his subsequent internal appeal of that denial. Nearly four years later, Moyer sued MetLife for the denied benefits under Section 502 of ERISA. The Plan document specified a three-year limitations period for filing such a lawsuit, but neither MetLife?ÇÖs benefit denial notice to Moyer nor the Plan?ÇÖs summary plan description (?Ç£SPD?Ç¥) included any such limitations period. The district court dismissed Moyer?ÇÖs lawsuit as being time-barred. On appeal, the Sixth Circuit looked to ERISA?ÇÖs claims procedure regulations, which require benefit denial notices to include a description of the plan?ÇÖs review procedures and the time limits applicable to such procedures, noting that such regulations expressly include a claimant?ÇÖs right to judicial review. Because MetLife?ÇÖs benefit denial notice did not include the applicable three-year time limit that was in the Plan, the Court held that Moyer?ÇÖs lawsuit was not time-barred. The court did not reach the question of whether the judicial review time limit must be included in the SPD. Please note that the Sixth Circuit?ÇÖs holding in this case differs from decisions of certain other federal appeals courts that have applied a ?Ç£substantial compliance?Ç¥ standard when assessing compliance with ERISA?ÇÖs claims procedure regulations. The takeaway from this case is that ERISA plan administrators and claims fiduciaries are well-advised to ensure that any time limits for judicial review imposed by an ERISA plan are incorporated into both the benefit denial notices for any denied claims under the plan as well as the plan?ÇÖs SPD.

A copy of Moyer v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. is available here.

The lawyers of our Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Practice Group are readily able to assist companies on a nationwide basis with implementing sophisticated benefit plans and providing answers to their most challenging compensation issues. Additionally, our lawyers are well aware of the daily employee benefits challenges facing companies of all sizes and are capable of helping in-house lawyers and human resources personnel with the day-to-day advice and guidance necessary to properly administer employee benefits plans.

Leave a Reply

September 2014
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  

Archives