On July 26, 2017, in Soft Gel Technologies, Inc., v. Jarrow Formulas, Inc. (Appeal No. 17-1051, Fed. Cir. July 26, 2017), the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“the CAFC”) affirmed the Patent and Trial Appeal Board’s (PTAB) rulings from three inter partes reexaminations invalidating numerous claims of three patents assigned to Soft Gel Technologies, Inc. (“Soft Gel”) on obviousness grounds. The CAFC, in affirming the PTAB, applied various canons of obviousness law to refute Soft Gel’s position, specifically emphasizing that an obviousness rejection cannot be overcome by attacking references individually, and that only a reasonable expectation of success, rather than absolute predictability of success, is required as a basis of motivation to combine references. Soft Gel Patents Each specification of the Soft Gel patents (“U.S. Patent Nos. 8,124,072 (“’072 patent”), 8,105,583 (“’583 patent”), and 8,147,826 (“’826 patent”)) describes a method for dissolving a substance commonly referred to as… Continue Reading
Oil Patch Bankruptcy Monitor: includes details on oil and gas producers that have filed for bankruptcy since the beginning of 2015 – most recent update July 31, 2017. Oilfield Services Bankruptcy Tracker: includes details on middle-market oilfield services companies that have filed for bankruptcy since the beginning of 2015 – most recent update July 31 2017. Midstream Report: includes details on the midstream companies that have filed for bankruptcy since 2015 – most recent update July 31, 2017.