Federal Court of Appeals Determines that ERISA?ÇÖs Six-Year Statute of Repose May Be Expressly Waived
In a case of first impression for a federal appellate court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that a fiduciary may affirmatively waive any defenses based on the six-year statute of repose in Section 413 of ERISA. In this case, the U.S. Secretary of Labor brought an action against the company and its owner/CEO who was also the trustee of the company?ÇÖs employee stock ownership plan (?Ç£ESOP?Ç¥), claiming that the owner engaged in prohibited self-dealing by causing the plan to purchase company stock at inflated prices. While attempting to negotiate a settlement, the?áSecretary of Labor agreed to delay filing suit in exchange for the defendants executing a series of tolling agreements, in which they agreed they would ?Ç£not assert in any manner the defense of statute of limitations, the doctrine of waiver, laches, or estoppel, or any other matter constituting an avoidance of the Secretary?ÇÖs claims… Continue Reading
The IRS recently announced cost-of-living adjustments for 2018. Below is a list of some of the key annual limits that will apply to qualified retirement plans in 2018: Compensation limit used in calculating a participant?ÇÖs benefit accruals: increased to $275,000. Elective deferrals to 401(k) and 403(b) plans: increased to $18,500. Annual additions to a defined contribution plan: increased to $55,000. Catch-up contributions for employees aged 50 and over to 401(k) and 403(b) plans: remains unchanged at $6,000. Annual benefit limit for a defined benefit plan: increased to $220,000. Compensation dollar limit for defining a ?Ç£key employee?Ç¥ in a top heavy plan: remains unchanged at $175,000. Compensation dollar limit for defining a ?Ç£highly compensated employee?Ç¥: remains unchanged at $120,000. The full list of 2018 plan limits can be found in IRS Notice 2017-64.
On October 19, 2017, the IRS released Revenue Procedure 2017-58, which increases the 2018 limits for certain fringe and welfare benefits as follows: Health Care Flexible Spending Accounts: The maximum amount an employee may contribute toward a healthcare flexible spending account through salary reduction is $2,650. Qualified Transportation Benefits: The monthly limits for qualified parking expenses and commuter highway expenses/transit passes are $260. The limit for qualified bicycle commuting reimbursements is unchanged ($20 per month). Adoption Assistance Programs: The maximum amount that can be excluded from an employee?ÇÖs gross income for qualified adoption expenses provided through an adoption assistance program is $13,840. This limit phases out for taxpayers whose modified adjusted gross income is over certain limits. Qualified Small Employer Health Reimbursement Arrangement (?Ç£QSEHRA?Ç¥): The reimbursement limit for a QSEHRA is $5,050 for individual coverage and $10,250 for family coverage. QSEHRAs are limited to small employers with fewer than 50… Continue Reading
In Owens Corning v. Fast Felt Corp., No. 2016-2613, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 19827 (Fed. Cir. October 11, 2017), the Federal Circuit reversed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board?ÇÖs (PTAB) final written decision in IPR2015-00650.?á While the PTAB found that the petitioner had failed to show obviousness of any challenged claim, the Federal Circuit disagreed, finding that under a proper broadest reasonable interpretation of the claims, the ?Ç£record conclusively establishe[d] obviousness.?Ç¥ Owens Corning, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 19827 at *2.?á The Federal Circuit therefore reversed the PTAB?ÇÖs final written decision without remand, finding the challenged claims unpatentable as obvious. Background Owens Corning petitioned for inter partes review of Fast Felt?ÇÖs U.S. Patent No. 8,137,757, which claims and describes methods of ?Ç£applying nail tabs to roofing and building cover materials?Ç¥ which cover wood roof decks and stud walls. ?ÇÖ757 Patent, Abstract. For example, during the construction of a roof, an underlayment… Continue Reading
Executive Order Directs Agencies to Consider Expanding HRAs and Alternatives to the Public Health Insurance Marketplace
On October 12, 2017, President Trump issued an Executive Order directing the U.S. Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor, and the Treasury to ?Ç£consider proposing regulations or revising [existing] guidance?Ç¥ for health reimbursement arrangements (?Ç£HRAs?Ç¥), association health plans (?Ç£AHPs?Ç¥), and short-term coverage related to loosening existing requirements under the Affordable Care Act (?Ç£ACA?Ç¥).?á While the Executive Order does not literally order the agencies to issue regulations or change existing guidance, it is likely that the agencies will do so.?áThis process should take months, and thus the Executive Order is a signal of change rather than change itself.?áThere are few details at this time, but a high-level summary including open issues is below: HRAs ?Çô The clear intent is to enable employers to offer HRAs to current employees that can be used to purchase insurance policies from the individual insurance market.?áThis could be accomplished by either permitting HRAs to integrate… Continue Reading
U.S. Department of Labor Proposes Extension of Applicability Date of New Disability Claims Procedures
On October 12, 2017, the DOL issued a proposed rule to delay for 90 days (through April 1, 2018) the applicability of the final regulations which amended the claims procedure requirements for ERISA-covered employee benefit plans that provide disability benefits. The final regulations were issued by the DOL in December 2016 and, as issued, would apply to claims for disability benefits filed on or after January 1, 2018. (Note: a more detailed discussion of the final regulations is available in our prior blog post.) Following the DOL’s issuance of the final regulations, various stakeholders asserted that the final regulations would drive up disability benefit plan costs and cause an increase in litigation and, in doing so, impair workers’ access to disability benefits. The DOL seeks public comments on its proposed 90-day delay of the applicability date of the final regulations in order to solicit additional public input and examine regulatory… Continue Reading
IRS Issues Regulations and Guidance Updating Mortality Tables and Procedures for Using Substitute Mortality Tables
On October 3, 2017, the IRS issued final regulations updating the mortality tables that most defined benefit pension plan sponsors must use when calculating lump-sum benefits for participants and determining annual funding obligations. In addition, the final regulations provide updated procedures for sponsors of large defined benefit plans to use when applying to the IRS to use substitute mortality tables based on actual plan mortality experience. In conjunction with the regulations, the IRS issued Notice 2017-60, which explains the new mortality tables, and Revenue Procedure 2017-55, which explains and supplements the changes to the requirements for using substitute mortality tables. The regulations apply to plan years beginning on and after January 1, 2018. The final regulations are available?áhere. Notice 2017-60 is available?áhere. Rev. Proc. 2017-55 is available?áhere.
The U.S. Departments of the Treasury, Labor, and Health and Human Services have issued new interim final rules to expand the exemptions from the contraceptive coverage mandate under the Affordable Care Act. The new exemptions encompass (i) non-governmental plan sponsors and institutions of higher learning that object to the mandate based on sincerely held religious beliefs, and (ii) certain entities and individuals that object to the mandate based on sincerely held non-religious moral convictions. The interim final rules keep the accommodation process as an optional process for certain exempt entities that wish to use it voluntarily. Exempt entities must ensure that the exclusion of contraceptive coverage is clear in the plan document. The interim final rules were effective October 6, 2017. The interim final rules are available?áhere and?áhere.
A recent Federal Circuit case reminds us how difficult it is for a patent holder to win an infringement case based on a doctrine of equivalents (DOE) infringement theory. In Jang v. Bos. Sci. Corp. & Scimed Life Sys., Inc., No. 16-1275 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 29, 2017), the Fed. Cir. affirmed the district court?ÇÖs vacatur of the jury?ÇÖs infringement verdict, finding that Boston Scientific Corporation?ÇÖs (BSC) product did not infringe the asserted claims of Dr. Jang?ÇÖs patent under the DOE because Dr. Jang did not meet his burden of proving that his DOE theory did not ensnare the prior art. The DOE allows a patent holder to prove infringement by an accused device if the accused device performs substantially the same function as claimed in substantially the same way to obtain substantially the same result, even if it does not literally infringe the claims of the patent. Graver Tank &… Continue Reading
On September 21, 2017, the SEC issued interpretive guidance with respect to the pay ratio rule (i) clarifying its position on a registrant?ÇÖs use of reasonable estimates, assumptions and methodologies, and statistical sampling permitted by the rule, which are made with a reasonable basis and in good faith; (ii) clarifying that a registrant may use appropriate existing internal records, such as tax or payroll records, in determinations regarding the inclusion of non-U.S. employees and in identifying the median employee; and (iii) providing guidance as to when a registrant may use widely recognized tests under another area of law (such as the Internal Revenue Code) to determine whether its workers are employees for purposes of the rule. In addition, the SEC?ÇÖs Division of Corporation Finance issued separate guidance on using statistical sampling methodologies and other reasonable methodologies, providing examples to illustrate the use of such methodologies. View the SEC?ÇÖs press release… Continue Reading